|
|
|
BLACK
EYE PEAS
Effect
of NutriPak Fertilizer on Yield of 'California' Black-eyed
Peas
M.A.
Wilson1, C. Stevens2, D. Harp1, and V.A. Khan1
1Department of Agriculture, Southeast Missouri State University,
Cape Girardeau, MO 63701
2George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station,
Tuskegee, University, Tuskegee, AL, 36088
Introduction
Beans
and peas are members of the Leguminoseae, a family of plants
with worldwide distribution. There are nearly 30 legumes
species used as vegetables, most of which are important
in countries other than the United States. A few grown for
tubers or tuberous roots, most are valued for seeds and/or
pods. Black-eyed peas are valued for their seeds. Most of
the black-eyed peas in the United States are grown and consumed
in the southern United States. In the United States, those
with commercial significance include garden pea, cowpea,
snap-bean, and dry bean, mung bean, lima bean, soybean,
and small amount of chickpea, lentil, scarlet runner bean,
and fava bean (broad bean).
The
objective of this study was to determine the effect of three
levels of NutriPak fertilizer on the yield of black-eyed
peas.
Materials
and Methods
All
plots were prepared with a mould-board plow and rotavator
in early spring and 30 lbs. or triple 12-12-12 fertilizer
added prior to planting the peas. Peas were planted on June
5, 2002 with a drip irrigation system. Row spacing was 3
ft wide x seven ft long with seeds approximately 3 in apart
within rows. NutriPak fertilizer was applied when plants
were 3 inches tall and two weeks apart with second and third
application. Plots were drip irrigated as needed. Data collected
were number of pods per plot and weight of pods per plot.
All data was analyzed by Duncan's multiple range test.
Results
and Discussion
Black-eyed
peas responded similarly at all treatment levels, with no
significant differences found in the number and weight of
pods per plot (Table 1). There was no response to any nitrogen
treatment; the roman farmer recognized that clover would
enhance soil productivity, although the basis for this effect,
the biochemical reduction of the atmospheric nitrogen to
NH4 in the latter root nodules by the symbiotic bacterium
Rhizobium, was not understood until the nineteenth century.
To some degree, however, this symbiotic relationship limits
economic yields of legumes, since energy (carbohydrates)
must be diverted from dry matter accumulation to drive the
reduction of nitrogen. Our results did not show a response
to nitrogen.
Literature
Cited
- Perice,
Lincoln. Vegetables Characteristics, Production, and Marketing.
1987. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N. Y.
- Steel,
D.G.R. and J.R.Torrie. 1960. Principles and Procedures
of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.
Table
1. Number and weight of pods per plot as influenced by NutriPak
fertilizer. |
| Treatments
|
Number
of Pods / Plot |
Weight
of Pods / Plot |
| Control |
130a |
26a
|
| 8
ozs / ac |
138a
|
29a
|
| 16
ozs / ac |
125a |
31a
|
| 24
ozs/ ac |
224a |
43a
|
|
|
Mean
separation within columns with the same superscript are
not significantly different at the 5% level of probability
as determined by Duncan's multiple range test.
|
|
|
|
1999
Cotton Research
Research
Data Supplied By:
Kesler Farms, Vanduser, Missouri
Normal farming procedures were used in check areas.
All plots were irrigated with 38 inch rows.
Planting rate was 12.5 lbs. per acre.
Seed treatment with NutriPak was used on plots 1 and 2.
Rate used was 8oz./50lb. bag of seed. Equal to 2oz. per
acre.
All applications were 12oz banded over the row.
Only two applications were applied to plot 4.
|
| Plot# |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
| Variety |
DPL 436/RR |
DPL
436/RR |
SG
125/RR/BT |
SG
125/RR/BT |
|
Acres/
NutriPak
/Check |
3.4 |
3.6 |
7.68 |
6.78 |
|
Acres
/Check |
3.4 |
3.6 |
7.68 |
6.78 |
|
First
appl |
6/17/99 |
6/16/99 |
6/17/99
|
6/17/99 |
|
Second
appl |
6/29/99 |
6/29/99 |
7/01/99 |
7/06/99 |
|
Third
app |
7/13/99 |
7/13/99 |
7/13/99 |
N/A |
|
l
Lbs/Acre
/NutriPak
/Check |
734 |
689 |
813 |
887 |
|
Lbs
/Acre
/Check |
719 |
601
|
788 |
825 |
AVG.
Yield/Acre |
| Yield
+/- |
15
|
88
|
25
|
62
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
|
COTTON
NutriPak
COTTON RESEARCH PLOT
LONE OAK FARMS-WHARTON COUNTY TEXAS
FIELD:
IRRIGATED
PLANTING DATE: APRIL 15, 20002
VARIETY: STONEVILLE 4892 BR
HARVEST DATE: AUGUST 22, 2002
|
| Plot
1 |
APPLICATION
RATE |
DATE
APPLIED |
COTTON
STAGE |
LINT
LBS./ACRE |
| |
4
oz. Banded |
May
6, 2002 |
4
to 6 true leaf |
1,341
|
| |
8
oz. Banded |
May
20, 2002 |
Matchhead
Square |
|
| |
16
oz. Broadcast |
June
15, 2002 |
1st
Bloom |
|
| Check |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
| Plot
2 |
APPLICATION
RATE |
DATE
APPLIED |
COTTON
STAGE |
LINT
LBS./ACRE |
| |
8
oz. Banded |
May
6, 2002 |
Matchhead
Square |
1,
308 |
| |
16
oz. Broadcast |
May
20, 2002 |
1st
Bloom |
|
| Check |
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
| Plot
3 |
APPLICATION
RATE |
DATE
APPLIED |
COTTON
STAGE |
LINT
LBS./ACRE |
| |
16
oz. Broadcast |
May
20, 2002 |
1st
Bloom |
1,
149 |
| Check |
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
NutriPak
appeared to increase yields when used sequentially. The
late application at blooming did not increase yield over
the check.
|
|
|
|
POTATOES
NutriPak
Effect of NutriPak Fertilizer on Yield of Potatoes in Missouri
M.A.
Wilson, Derald A. Harp, V.A. Khan, and C. Stevens Department
of Agriculture, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape
Girardeau, MO 63701 George Washington Carver Experiment
Station, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee Inst. AL 36088 USA
Introduction
Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) are native to the Americans
and were cultivated from Chile to New Granda before the
discovery of the New World. Potatoes are not roots but specialized
underground storage stems called "tubers". Potatoes
are ranked with wheat and rice as one of the most important
staples in the human diet. NutriPak fertilizer (4-1-3) was
applied as a soluble fertilizer at different rates on "Atlantic
Potatoes". The objectives of these studies were to
evaluate the effect of three rates of NutriPak fertilizer
and the effect of bare soil polyethylene mulch on yield
of potatoes.
Methods
and Materials
This study with potatoes was conducted in the spring of
2001 at Stalling Brothers Farm, Charleston Missouri (Mississippi
County). The soil type was Lilbourn sandy loam (entisol).
Treatments were replicated three times with single row plots
with seed potatoes of the cultivar "Atlantic"
spaced 3 ft x 12 ft apart in a split-split plot designed
where "Atlantic" potatoes were the main plot.
Sub plots in this study were rates of fertilizer of 8, 16,
and 32 ounces per acre of NutirPak. Sub-sub plots were bare
soil and IRT 100 polyethlylene mulch.
All
plots were prepared with mould board plow and a disc harrow.
At planting 50 lb of Kmag, 50 lb of diammonium phosphate
and, 420 lb of 5-20-20 was used. On April 5, 2001, 85 lb
of urea as added. Potatoes were planted with a six-row planter
on March 25, 2001. IRT-100 polyethylene mulch was applied
to potatoes on April 19, 2001. Holes were punched into the
plastic to allow emerging potatoes to the sun light. On
May 5, 2001, 90 lbs of urea was applied to the soil and
20 lbs of a 32% nitrogen solution was applied through irrigation
water. Potatoes were sprayed with 3 applications of NutriPak
fertilizer of 8, 16, and 32 ounces per acre at 3 different
growth stages; 3 to 4 inches high, preflowering, and at
flowering. The dates of foliar treatments were April 26,
May 15, and June 5, 2001. Data collected were: total number
of grade A and grade B tubers, and total grade A weights
of tubers. A center pivot irrigation system was used for
irrigation and Carbarly insecticide and Bravo W-75 Fungicide
were used to control pests as needed.
Results
and Discussion
Data showed that potato numbers were highest with the 16
oz of NutriPak per acre with the bare soil treatment. Similar
results showed that the highest yield for grade B potatoes
were at the 16 oz of NutriPak per acre again with the bare
soil treatment. Potato yields were consistently higher for
both grade A and grade B with NutriPak fertilizer at 16
ounces per acre. This data showed that bare soil had the
highest number and weights of potatoes at 16 oz of NutriPak
per acre for both grade A and grade B potatoes. This years
potato crop yielded a bumper crop due to the ideal temperatures
and environmental conditions that occurred in Southeast
Missouri. Generally, polyethylene mulch tended to produce
higher yields compared to the bare soil treatments.
NutriPak
Effect of NutriPak Fertilizer on Yield of Potatoes in Missouri
DATA
|
| Effect
of NutriPak Fertilizer on Number of Grade A Potatoes |
Ounces
of NutriPak
Applied per Acre |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Bare Soil |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Black Plastic |
| 0
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
| 8 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
| 16 |
4.7 |
3.6 |
| 32 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
| Effect
of NutriPak Fertilizer on Number of Grade B Potatoes |
Ounces
of NutriPak
Applied per Acre |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Bare Soil |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Black Plastic |
| 0
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
| 8 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
| 16 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
| 32 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
| Effect
of NutriPak on Yield of Grade A Potatoes |
Ounces
of NutriPak
Applied per Acre |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Bare Soil |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Black Plastic |
| 0
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
| 8 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
| 16 |
4.7 |
3.3 |
| 32 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
| Effect
of NutriPak on Yield of Grade B Potatoes |
Ounces
of NutriPak
Applied per Acre |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Bare Soil |
Number
of Grade A
Potatoes, Black Plastic |
| 0
|
3.7 |
3.7 |
| 8 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
| 16 |
4.6 |
3.3 |
| 32 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
SOYBEANS
The
Effect of NutriPak on Soybeans in Southeast Missouri
PLOT
SIZE: 10 Acres treated and 10 acres untreated.
PLANTING
DATE: 5/12/01
VARIETY:
ASGROW 4902RR
IRRIGATION:
Furrow irrigated 4 times.
ROUNDUP
APPLICATIONS: 2 over the top.
Each
treatment was machine harvested and weighed separately.
TREATMENT
1: NutriPak was applied as a seed treatment at the rate
of 10 ounces per 100 lbs of seed. Next, NutriPak was applied
at the rate of 8 ounces per acre at the 3rd trifoliate stage.
Lastly, apply NutriPak at first bloom at the rate of 16
ounces per acre.
TREATMENT
2: Untreated Check--- Farmer's Standard Practice.
RESULTS/YIELD:
TREATMENT 1: 62 BUSHELS/ACRE
TREATMENT 2: 47 BUSHELS/ACRE
|
|
|
|
TOMATOES
Influence
of NutriPak Fertilizer on Yield of 'Better Boy' Tomatoes
in Southeast Missouri
M.
A. Wilson1, C. Stevens2, D. Harp1, and V. A. Khan2 1Department
of Agriculture, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape
Girardeau, MO 63701
2George Washington Carver Agricultural Experiment Station,
Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088.
Abstract.
An experiment was conducted in a randomized block design
in the spring of 2002 at the All American Garden Plots to
determine the effect of three rates of NutriPak fertilizer
on the yield of 'Better Boy' tomatoes. NutriPak fertilizer
was applied at three different growth stages with tomatoes.
There was a significant difference with the number of tomatoes,
however, the highest number of tomatoes occurred at the
24 ozs/ac treatment. There was a significant difference
of yield of tomatoes. Highest yield occurred with the 24
ozs/ac treatment.
Keywords:
NurtriPak fertilizer, 'Better Boy' tomatoes, marketable
number and yield.
Introduction
Tomatoes and peppers, although not among the most valuable
crops in nutrients per pound, are important contributors
to dietary needs because of the substantial per capita consumption
of each. In the United States, tomato consumption exceeds
only that of potato. Peppers, although a significant commodity
in the United States, have a higher consumption in other
countries. Tomatoes are grown extensively in southeast Missouri
on black polyethylene mulch with drip irrigation.
The
objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of
three rates of foliar applied NutriPak on the yield of 'Better
Boy' tomatoes in Missouri.
Methods
and Materials
This study was conducted in the spring of 2002 at Southeast
Missouri State University All American Garden Plots, Cape
Girardeau, Missouri. The soil typed used was Menfro silt
loam (entsol). All plots were prepared by tillage with a
moldboard plow and rotavator and 100 lbs. of triple twelve
(12-12-12) fertilizer added. Black polyethylene mulch was
applied with drip irrigation after row spacing was 5 ft
wide x 1.5 ft (between row) spacing. Tomatoes were transplanted
on June 4, 2002 and sprayed with a foliar application of
8, 16, and 24 ozs/ac of NutriPak fertilizer on June 5, 2002.
The second and third applications of NutriPak were applied
at pre-flowering on June 21, 2002 and the latter application
on July 11, 2002. Plots were drip irrigated as needed. Data
collected were: number and weights of marketable fruits.
All data were analyzed by Duncan's MRT (4).
Results
and Discussion
There was a significant difference in numbers of tomato
fruit (Table 1). The highest number of tomato fruits occurred
at the 24 ozs/ac treatment. There was a significant difference
at the 24 ozs/ac treatment. Highest yield of tomato fruit
occurred at the 24 ozs/ac treatment (Table 1). Hochmuth,
et al., (1994) reported that black polyethylene mulch, drip
irrigated lettuce required a maximum of 185 lbs of N per
acre. Their results showed a slightly higher need for N
compared to older reports (Bechenbach et al., Everett, 1980),
however, newer varieties and high plant populations used
in the Hochmuth study may account for the difference. Our
results showed that the highest number and weight occurred
at the 24 ozs/ac treatments and the data were significant.
Nitrogen rates for this study was 100 lbs of N per acre
in addition to the foliar applied NutriPak.
Literature
Cited
- Bechenbach,
J.R., F.S. Jamison, R.W. Ruprecht, and F.S. Adrews. 1941.
Crisphead lettuce in Florida-A preliminary report. Fla.
Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 365.
- Everett,
P.H., 1960. Influence of fertilizer rates and plastic
mulch on the production of two cultivars of crisphead
lettuce. Proc. Fla. State Hor. Soc. 93:243-245.
- Hochmuth,
G. and I. Secker. 1994. N requirements of crisphead lettuce
grown with drip irrigation on polyethylene mulched bed.
Proc. 24th Natl. Agriculture Plastic Congr. 24: 96-100.
- Steele,
D.G.R. and J.R. Torrie. 1960. Principle and Procedures
of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N. Y.
|
| Table
1. Influence of NutriPak fertilizer on number and yield
of 'Better Boy' tomatoes. |
| Treatments
|
Numbers
/ Plot |
Yield
# / Plot |
| Control
|
15b |
12b
|
| 8
ozs/ ac |
31b |
61b
|
| 16
ozs/ac |
18b |
83b |
| 32ozs/ac |
69a |
286a |
|
|
Mean
separation within columns with the same superscript are
not significantly different at the 5% level of probability
as determined by Duncan's multiple range test.
|
|
|
|
TURF
NutriPak
TURF TRIALS 2002
VARIETY:
Raliegh St. Augustine
Tif-Bermuda
RATED
1-5 (1 = DEAD, 5 = PERFECT)
|
| PRODUCT |
APPLICATION
RATE |
GROWTH |
COLOR |
WASTE
AT HARVEST |
| NutriPak |
32
ounces |
4.05 |
4.05 |
0 |
| NutriPak |
64
ounces |
4.16 |
4.16 |
4.5
|
| Medina |
1
gallon |
3.55 |
3.8 |
0 |
| Medina |
2
gallons |
4.47 |
3.55 |
4 |
| Turf
Ease |
8
ounces |
3.72 |
3.65 |
3.5 |
| Soil
Soft |
4
ounces |
3.8 |
3.9 |
4 |
| Awaken |
1
gallon |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.5
|
| Miracle
Grow |
40
pounds |
4.3 |
3.6 |
3 |
| Gypsum |
2
tons |
3.25 |
3.25
|
0 |
| Scotts
Turf |
200
pounds |
3.75 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
TREE
RESEARCH #1
June
25, 2001
During
late May and early June, as per our agreement, three study
plots were established in northeast Mississippi to determine
the effect spraying NutriPak would have on the growth of
three and four year old loblolly pine trees.
At
each plot, a treated row and an untreated row were measured.
The plan is to remeasure the plots in late 2001 after the
growing season is concluded. The growth increase in the
untreated trees will be considered the annual growth for
all trees. This increase will be subtracted from the total
growth of the treated trees. The difference between the
normal annual growth and the total growth of the treated
will be the growth attributable to the NutriPak treatment.
Tom
B. Wood
SUMMARY
OF PLOT INFORMATION
Bar
U
Location:
Pontotoc County, Mississippi
Conditions: Old field, heavy fescue
Soil type: Silty clay loam
Trees: Genectically improved loblolly pines planted in 1997
Treated:
46 trees sprayed with NutriPak at the rate of 32 ounces
per acre
Average diameter: 1.6 inches Average height: 73.1 inches
Untreated
(check row): 52 trees
Average diameter: 1.5 inches Average height: 67.5 inches
Maxie
Location:
Pontotoc County, Mississippi
Conditions: Old field, heavy wild grasses and weeds
Soil type: Silt loam
Trees: Genetically improved loblolly pines planted
in 1998
Treated:
20 trees sprayed with NutriPak at the rate of 32 ounces
per acre
Average diameter: 1.0 inches Average height: 56.5
inches
Untreated
(check row): 20 trees
Average diameter: 1.0 inches Average height: 56.0
inches
Hill
Location:
Prentiss County, Mississippi
Conditions: Old field, heavy wild grasses and weeds
Soil type: Fine sandy loam
Trees: Genetically improved loblolly pines planted
in 1998
Treated:
20 trees sprayed with NutriPak at the rate of 32 ounces
per acre
Average diameter: 1.4 inches Average height: 71.7
inches
Untreated
(check row): 20 trees
Average diameter: 1.1 inches Average height: 62.1 inches
|
|
|
|
TREE
RESEARCH #2
February
14, 2002
The
following are the results of the study to determine the
effect on growth by applying NUTRIPAK on three and four
year old loblolly pine trees.
Three
separate tracts in northeast Mississippi were selected.
Plots were established on each tract. Each plot consisted
of treated and untreated trees. Trees were measured in May,
2001 and remeasured in February 2002. The increase in growth
of the untreated trees was considered to be the normal annual
growth. The increase of the untreated plots was subtracted
from the increase of the treated plots. The difference was
considered the growth attributable to the NUTRIPAK treatment.
INCREASE
IN GROWTH (TREATED LESS UNTREATED)
| Tract
|
Diameter
(inches) |
%
diff. |
Height
(feet) |
%
diff. |
| Bar
U |
0 |
0 |
.4 |
17 |
| Maxie |
.1
|
25 |
.3 |
25 |
| Hill |
.1 |
25 |
.3 |
16 |
| Total |
.2 |
15 |
.1 |
19 |
0
indicates no or less different in the treated and untreated.
Negative values were treated as 0.
Tom
B. Wood
|
|
|
|
FIELD
CORN TEST PLOT
FIELD
#: P-4 (IRRIGATED)
PLANTING DATE: APRIL 10, 2002
VARIETY: DK 64 TBT
PLANTING RATE: 31,000 SEED/ACRE
HARVEST DATE: AUGUST 31, 2002
|
| PLOT
#4 |
APPLICATION
RATE |
DATE
PLANTED |
BUSHELS/ACRE
|
| A: |
8
oz. NP in furrow at planting |
April
10, 2002 |
161
|
| B: |
2
oz. NP on seed |
April
10, 2002 |
157
|
| C: |
Check |
April
10, 2002 |
145
|
|
|
|
|
 |